|
Written by Daniel Dewey
|
|
Thursday, 22 October 2009 20:52 |
|
What is the best things? When it comes to MP3 players, there's the iPod and the Zune are big players. But which is the best of all the MP3 players, or of any other category? Simple, there isn't. The best things are typically chosen by the most amount of people. So in our MP3 example, that would be the iPod. However, this only sparks debate. That is why, in truth, there is no best. It is really what is more popular. If something truly was the best thing out there, there would be no competition, no alternative. This is why there are Microsoft Windows, Apple Mac OSX, Linux (and it's hundreds of flavors). There are PS3, Xbox 360, Wii, PC. The list goes on, and my potential horrendous crammer and punctuation could go on in this list if I let it. The only truth, the only fact, the only absolute, is if there is no opposing side. The moment there is one, there is no more best thing out there. This further encourages freedom of speech, and I'm all for it, but do not speak in absolute language. When someone says that something sucks, that is in their opinion. But because they never said the words, "in my opinion", those who don't know better will assume that it is a fact and will not investigate further. However, those who sit on that side of the fence, the side that just got insulted by the comment, or disagree, will rally in no organized manner to silence or counter the naysayer. But their both wrong, and right. Wrong in the minds of those that disagree, and right in the mind of those who agree. I write this in response to an article I read about Stephen King saying that the author of Twilight, Stephanie Mayer, "can't write". I respect his opinion, he's entitled to it. But if she can't write, then why is she getting money out of it? Why are there movies getting made based off of the series? Why? Because she can write. She can write because people read it, and enjoy it, and love it. I love her writing, I enjoyed it. The others who don't like her writing, it all comes down to personal preference, just like everything else. So which is the better author? Neither. Even though I can't read Stephen Kings writings, I fall asleep reading his writing, I don't like his writing. Does that mean I believe he's an author that can't write? No, he's an author I can't read. He's a wonderful author, people enjoy his writings, I enjoy some of the movies based off of his writings, I just don't enjoy his writings. It's not my reading style, just as Stephanie Mayer's writing style is not Stephen King's reading style. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, their freedom to express those opinions, but when you do so, make sure you express those opinions correctly so there is no confusion. Now on the flip side is that article writers may have altered what he said, I'll modify what I said for those writers as well. If you are expressing someone else's opinion, don't alter the language to modify one's opinion, you are free to do so, but just remember, you are not making the world a better place, you are actually making it worse. Either quote it right, or don't quote it at all. And don't quote it differently either. If you are unsure of what he said, or on how to interpret it, then make a simple note saying, hey, I'm probably quoting this wrong, disclaimer here. Tread life carefully, cause one wrong step and it's game over, with no more lives, no reset button, and no panic button. |
|
not a game post but a rant |
|
|
|
|
Written by Daniel Dewey
|
|
Sunday, 09 August 2009 07:24 |
Just to warn readers now, this is a rant. You've been warned. I was going through the iTunes store after hearing a Metallica song on RockBand2 for the Xbox 360. I really liked it. Looking at some of the other things they had, I came across this $100 album that contained almost every single song they've done. I decided to read the reviews of the collection. Overall it was rated 5 stars, but being me and wanting both sides of the story, I decided to look at the lower reviews. Particularly the one starts. Holy crap, not a single one star reviewed the collection explaining why they thought it was bad. No details, no reason, just a bunch of whiners and people who nothing better to do but slam others (which I have theory on that I'll explain later). While reading and becoming increasingly urked (and that's putting it nicely), I decided on something. When I release my first shareware game, I will allow reviews. But here is the catch, the reviewers must have a detailed explanation on why they liked or disliked the game. What was it that needs improvement, what was it that really made the adrenaline flow, etc. The review must be helpful, otherwise, I'll remove it. Whether the review was good or not. Now I now what your thinking, but that's filtering reviews, you could just remove all the bad reviews and make your games look really good. Yes, I could, but I'm not going to. Because reviews that have details help both the developer and the buyer. I'm not going to lie to customers, I want to make sure they are buying or not buying a product of mine with as many facts as possible. It's not fair to buyers to come in and spend on money, not knowing what they are getting into. Especially on digital content where returns are impossible. And even though this is my business man side of me, it also has a conscious. A business doesn't need to lie, cheat, deceive or anything related to, in order to do well. Just create good products to begin with. That's my stance on it anyway. Now I must also say that this isn't the first time I've seen this. I've seen it at Amazon.com, Newegg.com, Bestbuy.com, anywhere and everywhere that reviews can be posted and viewed. So if you ever review things online, please add some useful details for those reading them. Personally, I don't review things unless I can give a thorough review on every aspect of the product. So in summary, when the first shareware game of mine is released, I'll allow reviews, but they must be informative, otherwise they will be removed despite what the rating was. If your still reading this, first off, I did warn you at the beginning, second, wow, I'm impressed. No go forth my followers, and write informative reviews. ;~P Next time will be a game update, I promise. |
|
Last Updated on Sunday, 09 August 2009 07:28 |
|
|
Written by Daniel Dewey
|
|
Monday, 19 October 2009 18:27 |
Just got Windows 7, the version that will hit shelves later this month. Here's my take on it: It's what Windows Vista should have been the first go around plus updates. I haven't had to curse at it yet, my hard drive is mine and isn't getting bullied like it was on Vista. I haven't found anything that won't run on it so far. Once I do, then I can test the XP emulator side of it. Overall, a decent OS, but not mind blowing. Fancy graphics without killing the machine, I can even run it within a Virtual Machine and not have to compete with it. The only thing I disappointed in is the lack of ability to update from XP to 7. However, for those who have Vista, there is an upgrade option. That should keep all of your files and everything in one piece during the upgrade. One thing I've been reading is that many will have to purchase a new machine to get 7 because of the hardware specs. I see no reason for it. My desktop ran Vista for a while before downgrading back to XP. My desktop is pretty powerful and couldn't run Vista. But it can run 7 with no problems. If your happy with the machine you have now, just upgrade the OS. If not, go ahead and get a new machine. If/when you go to move from your current Windows to 7, just remember, Windows always runs a little different on each and every machine. If it doesn't run the way I said it ran for me, remember, it's Windows, it's never perfect, and it isn't adapted to your hardware. It seems like operating systems always run different for everybody. Windows runs well for many, while causing early baldness in others. The same goes for Mac and Linux. Should you drop everything and get 7? Only if your unhappy with your current install of Windows. Will it cause you to love it more than your Mac or Linux install. Only if you don't like it. Like I said, there's nothing mind blowing about Windows 7. It's just what Vista should have been the first go around. That's my take. |
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 22 October 2009 21:33 |
|
Interesting turn of events |
|
|
|
|
Written by Daniel Dewey
|
|
Friday, 07 August 2009 17:56 |
This was posted on A Factor Games Developer Blog: So I've suddenly started have people begin commenting on my blog, not that that's a bad thing, I've just surprised. Anyway, because I can't keep coming back here to approve comments, I've changed some things. 1st) You now must create an account in order to comment, 2nd) Comments will be auto-approved but I will come back and view comments every so often to make sure they aren't getting out of hand. I also want to make it clear, in case people think this is an independent developer with multiple people working for it, it's not. Currently independent developer is quite literal, I'm the only one. Finally, more of a curiosity, I would like it if those who make their first post on here, if they could also mention how they came upon here. If you came here through the main site, then please also include how you came upon that, e.g. what were you searching, etc. Again, it's curiosity, not required. Thanks |
|